Analyst Relations for PMMs: How to Brief Gartner, Forrester, and IDC (and Actually Move the Needle)

Most product marketers treat analyst relations like a high-stakes performance review. You schedule the briefing, prepare the slide deck, get coached by the executive team, present your best material, and then wait anxiously for where you land in the Magic Quadrant.

That model is transactional. It produces mediocre outcomes — both in terms of analyst influence and in terms of the intelligence you could be extracting from analysts but aren't.

The PMMs who build effective AR programs operate differently. They treat analysts less like judges and more like informed strategic advisors who have context you need and influence you want — and who, done right, can become one of the most valuable feedback loops in your product marketing toolkit.

This is the playbook. How to brief analysts well, how to get more value from every inquiry, how to prepare for evaluation cycles without panic, and how to build the kind of ongoing relationship that makes a real difference when it counts.

---

Why Analyst Relations Belongs in PMM's Orbit

There's a common organizational pattern: analyst relations reports into communications or corporate marketing, and PMM is occasionally pulled in to support a major evaluation. This structure misses most of the value.

Analysts advise buyers actively evaluating your category. When a procurement team or a CISO or a CFO starts an evaluation process, the first call they often make is to Gartner or Forrester. The guidance they receive in that call shapes what capabilities they prioritize, which vendors make the short list, and how they structure their RFP.

PMM is the team that understands what those buyers care about, how your product maps to their priorities, and how you're positioned relative to competitors. That knowledge is exactly what makes analyst relationships productive.

At the same time, analysts have access to information that should feed directly into your positioning work: aggregate buyer research, competitive benchmarking, emerging category definitions, and unfiltered perspective on how the market actually perceives your product versus how you perceive it.

This is a two-way intelligence relationship. PMM is the logical owner.

---

Understanding the Analyst Ecosystem

Before getting tactical, it helps to understand how the major firms differ and what they're actually looking for.

Gartner

Gartner's flagship outputs for most B2B SaaS categories are the Magic Quadrant (MQ) and the Market Guide. The MQ evaluates vendors across two axes (ability to execute and completeness of vision) and produces the familiar four-quadrant visual that buyers screenshot into board decks.

Gartner analysts handle a high volume of client inquiries — meaning they're advising buyers actively in your market on a daily basis. That makes them genuinely well-informed about what buyers are prioritizing and where vendors are falling short. It also means they're busy. Your job in every Gartner interaction is to be efficient, direct, and substantive.

Forrester

Forrester produces Waves (their evaluation framework), as well as significant original research on buyer behavior, technology adoption, and category definition. Forrester analysts tend to be more thesis-driven than Gartner — they come to calls with a POV, and they want to debate it.

The best Forrester interactions feel like conversations between peers. Bring your own thesis about where the market is going. Expect to be challenged. Don't prepare a pitch deck for a Forrester briefing if you can help it — bring a narrative.

IDC

IDC is particularly strong in market sizing and share tracking, and their MarketScapes evaluate vendors in specific segments. IDC is frequently influential in highly technical or infrastructure-heavy categories, and their analysts tend to be deeply technical.

The regional firms (G2, TrustRadius, and others)

These are increasingly relevant because buyers use them for peer reviews and comparison research. They operate on different rules — PMM influence is largely about ensuring your product data is accurate, your case studies are current, and your customer community is engaged enough to leave reviews.

---

The Three Jobs of a PMM in Analyst Relations

1. Deliver briefings that actually land

A briefing is a scheduled call — typically 60 minutes — where you update analysts on your product, strategy, and market position. Analysts don't charge for briefings; they're part of how analysts stay current on their coverage area.

Most vendor briefings are disappointing. The vendor shows up with a 40-slide deck, spends 35 minutes on product capabilities, leaves 10 minutes for questions, and provides answers that feel rehearsed. The analyst finishes the call knowing roughly what the product does, but with no clearer sense of where the company is actually going, how customers are using it in practice, or what the vendor's genuine differentiation is.

A briefing that lands looks different:

Lead with a market POV, not a product tour. Analysts think in categories and market trends. Start by articulating your view of what's happening in the market — what buyers are struggling with, what the legacy approaches are failing to address, and where you believe the category is headed. A well-articulated market POV signals strategic thinking. It also invites the analyst to engage, because they have opinions about this.

Be direct about where you're strong and where you're not. Analysts talk to your competitors. They talk to your customers. They know your weaknesses. Pretending you don't have any doesn't make you look confident; it makes you look evasive. The vendors who earn analyst trust are the ones who say, "Here's where we lead, here's where we're still building, here's how we're thinking about it." That honesty is rare enough that it's differentiated.

Bring customer evidence, not use case slides. "Our platform enables X" is generic. "A mid-market financial services company reduced their sourcing cycle time by 40% in the first six months" is evidence. Analysts want to understand real-world deployment patterns, adoption challenges, and outcome data. Customer stories — even anonymized ones — are worth ten feature slides.

Leave time for a real conversation. The most valuable part of any analyst briefing is the 15 minutes at the end where you stop presenting and they start talking. Protect that time. Ask directly: "Based on what you're hearing from buyers in our space, what are we not talking about that we should be?" That question, asked genuinely, produces intelligence you cannot buy.

2. Run inquiries as research, not just customer service

An inquiry is a reverse call — you're paying for analyst time, and you're the one asking questions. If your company has an analyst relations contract, you have a budget of inquiry hours to spend.

Many PMMs use inquiries reactively: they call when they need help preparing for an evaluation, or when a large deal stalled and they want to understand buyer objections. This is fine, but it significantly underutilizes the resource.

The PMMs who get the most out of inquiries treat them as primary research.

Use inquiries to pressure-test your positioning. Share your core messaging and ask the analyst to respond as a skeptical buyer. "If a VP of Procurement heard us say X, where would their objection be?" This kind of feedback is faster, more informed, and more honest than most internal positioning reviews.

Use inquiries to understand competitive perception. "How do buyers in our market typically distinguish between us and [Competitor]?" is a question analysts can answer with real data from their advisory calls. The answer is often different from what your sales team reports.

Use inquiries to get ahead of evaluation criteria. If an MQ or Wave is coming in your category, analysts often signal — subtly or directly — what capabilities are going to be weighted. An inquiry three months before an evaluation period opens is a strategic investment.

Use inquiries to inform your product roadmap dialogue. If you're advocating internally for a particular product direction, analyst perspective on market demand carries weight with product leadership. "Gartner is seeing consistent buyer demand for X in this segment" is a data point, not just an opinion.

3. Manage the ongoing relationship

The biggest mistake in analyst relations is treating it as event-driven: you engage when there's an MQ cycle, you disengage when it ends.

Analysts have long memories. The vendor who only shows up during evaluation season is remembered as transactional. The vendor who sends relevant customer evidence in January, shares their product roadmap in March, and proactively flags competitive news in May is remembered as a strategic partner.

The practical implication: build a light-touch AR cadence. One proactive update per analyst per quarter — not a full briefing, just a note: "Here's what's changed, here's a customer proof point, here's what we're working on." It takes 20 minutes to send. It maintains the relationship without requiring a full production cycle.

---

Preparing for a Major Evaluation

When a Magic Quadrant, Forrester Wave, or IDC MarketScape is open in your category, the stakes change. This is the structured process that maximizes your placement.

Step 1: Confirm coverage and timeline

Analysts publish their research agenda. Gartner's Magic Quadrant calendar is available to Gartner clients; Forrester Waves are announced via their research calendar. If you're not monitoring this proactively, you can miss the window for influencing the research.

Contact the lead analyst directly — or through your AR contact if you have one — and ask to be included in the evaluation. This sounds obvious but some vendors miss it entirely.

Step 2: Complete the vendor questionnaire precisely

Most evaluation methodologies involve a detailed questionnaire. This is the most important artifact you'll produce for an evaluation — more important than your briefing. It's scored.

The mistake: rushing it, treating it like an RFP response, or delegating it to someone who doesn't understand the full product.

PMM should own this document. The scoring criteria maps directly to your product capabilities, customer evidence, and strategy — all things PMM understands better than a corporate comms team.

Read the criteria carefully. Answer what was asked, not what you want to say. Provide specific evidence — customer names, deployment scale, outcome data — wherever the criteria allows. Vague answers score poorly.

Step 3: Brief the analyst before the evaluation closes

Once the questionnaire is submitted, request a briefing with the analyst covering your category. This isn't your last chance to influence — but it's a meaningful one.

In this briefing, don't repeat the questionnaire. Assume they've read it. Instead, make three points:

1. Your most differentiating capability, with a customer example
2. Where your roadmap is heading and why that reflects market direction
3. One thing that you believe the evaluation criteria may be underweighting

That third point is the one most vendors skip. It's also the one that often produces the most useful analyst response — either they agree with you (which you can note), or they explain why the criteria is weighted that way (which helps you understand the model).

Step 4: Customer reference preparation

Most evaluations include customer reference checks. Analysts contact your customers directly and ask about outcomes, implementation experience, support quality, and overall satisfaction.

Your reference list should not be your happiest customers. It should be your most articulate customers — the ones who can describe in clear, specific terms what they were struggling with before, what they implemented, and what measurably changed. Happiness without specificity is forgettable.

Brief your references before they're contacted. Not to script their answers — that backfires when the reference says something that sounds prepared. Instead, brief them on the evaluation process and remind them of the specific outcomes data they have.

Step 5: Review the draft when offered

Many analyst firms offer vendors a factual review period before research is published. This is not the time to dispute your placement or argue with the analyst's conclusions. That approach damages your relationship and rarely changes anything.

The factual review is for correcting errors: your revenue figures, your customer count, your geographic coverage, a product capability that's described inaccurately. Be precise, be professional, and be quick. Analysts are on deadline.

---

How AR Feeds Back into Your Positioning

Here's the value that most companies leave on the table: the intelligence flowing from analyst relationships should be feeding your core positioning work.

Every analyst briefing, every inquiry, every evaluation response is a data point about how the market perceives your category, your competitors, and your differentiation. Most of that data lives in someone's notes and never gets synthesized.

Build a simple feedback loop:

• After every analyst interaction, write a 5-bullet debrief: what they said about the category, what they said about your competitors, what skepticism they expressed about your product, and what buyer priorities they mentioned.
• Route those debriefs to your positioning working group, your product team, and your sales enablement team.
• Over time, look for patterns: where is analyst perception consistently different from how you're positioning yourself? That gap is a problem to solve.

Analyst perception is a lagging indicator of market perception. Buyers who called Gartner last quarter are the buyers you're talking to this quarter. Their questions to analysts become the objections in your sales cycle. If analysts are consistently skeptical about your roadmap velocity, expect that skepticism in enterprise evaluations.

The PMM who closes that loop — using analyst intelligence to refine positioning before it shows up in lost deals — is doing AR right.

---

Common Mistakes That Hurt Analyst Relationships

Sending a pitch deck, not a briefing document. Pitch decks are designed to impress non-expert audiences. Analysts are experts. Slides with big stock photos and benefit headlines make them feel like they're being sold to. Bring a briefing document: tight narrative, customer evidence, product architecture context.

Using legal language in every response. "We cannot discuss future roadmap plans" is a reasonable policy, but if every roadmap question gets a liability-hedge, analysts stop asking. Share directional plans at a high level — "We're investing in X because buyers are asking for Y" — without binding commitments.

Only contacting analysts when you need something. Relationship equity matters. The vendor that calls only during evaluation season has zero goodwill to draw on when the call doesn't go well.

Conflating AR with PR. Analyst relations is not press outreach. Analysts aren't publishing your press releases. They're advising buyers, writing research, and scoring evaluations. The goal is to be understood accurately, not to generate coverage.

Not tracking what analysts say about you. Analyst research is expensive to access, but your buyers are reading it. At minimum, monitor what Gartner, Forrester, and IDC publish in your category through your AR team or client access. If they're describing your product or differentiation inaccurately, you need to correct it in the next interaction.

---

Analyst Relations for PMMs Without a Dedicated AR Team

Most companies below enterprise scale don't have a dedicated analyst relations function. If that's you, this is what an effective lightweight AR program looks like:

Identify your key analysts. Find out which 2 to 4 analysts cover your category at Gartner and Forrester. Follow them on LinkedIn. Read their published research. You want to know their thesis before you ever get on a call.

Schedule one proactive briefing per firm per year. Most contracts include vendor briefings. Use them. Even if you're not in an active evaluation, a well-run briefing maintains presence and surfaces intelligence.

Request inquiries for the questions that matter. If you have inquiry hours, spend them on the questions with the most downstream impact: positioning validation, competitive perception, evaluation criteria preview.

Create a simple AR brief. Before any analyst interaction, write a one-page summary: what's changed in the product, what customers are saying, what your market POV is, and what you want to learn from the call. This brief ensures you're aligned internally and makes the call more focused.

Track your reputation over time. After any MQ or Wave placement, debrief deeply: what would it have taken to place better? What did the scoring reveal about gaps in your product, your evidence, or your story? That debrief drives next year's program.

---